SafeScan.AI
Professional Plan Demo · Sample Data Only

See how SafeScan turns AI risk into a board-ready compliance audit.

This demo shows a sample Professional-plan audit for Acme Global Technologies. Real uploads, scans, and reports are available only after creating an account and selecting a paid plan.

Important Demo Disclaimer
  • • This public demo uses fictional sample data only.
  • • No real company information is displayed.
  • • SafeScan does not invent incidents, breaches, fines, or compliance outcomes.
  • • Real reports are generated only from customer uploads, scans, and evidence.
  • • Results should be independently reviewed by compliance, legal, or security professionals where appropriate.
84/100
AI Compliance Score
143
AI Systems Detected
12
Governance Gaps
€8.7M
Potential Exposure
Financial Exposure Breakdown

€8.7M in potential AI compliance exposure identified.

SafeScan converts technical AI governance gaps into board-level financial risk, helping executives understand which issues require immediate action.

Projected Exposure Reduction
74%
Critical Risk
Human oversight controls missing
€5.2M
Estimated demo exposure
High Risk
Missing AI governance policy
€2.1M
Estimated demo exposure
High Risk
Unapproved shadow AI usage
€1.4M
Estimated demo exposure
Board Readiness Score
72/100
Needs Executive Review

SafeScan translates technical AI findings into a board-level readiness score so leadership can understand whether the organisation is audit-ready.

Required Before Regulatory Audit
AI Governance Policy
Approved AI Tool Register
Human Oversight Procedures
Vendor Risk Reviews
Evidence Pack
Board Sign-Off
Current Readiness
72%
Target Readiness
95%

Critical Findings

Sample issues SafeScan would surface for board and compliance review.

Missing AI Governance Policy

High · €2.1M

No formal AI acceptable-use policy was identified for employees using generative AI tools across the organisation.

Recommended Action

Create and deploy an AI Governance Policy covering approved tools, restricted use, data handling, and human oversight.

Unapproved Shadow AI Usage

High · €1.4M

Unapproved AI tools were detected in the sample inventory, creating potential privacy, security, and vendor-risk exposure.

Recommended Action

Create an approved AI tools register and block or review unapproved AI applications before continued use.

Human Oversight Controls Missing

Critical · €5.2M

High-impact AI workflows do not show documented human review, escalation, or accountability controls.

Recommended Action

Implement human-in-the-loop review procedures for sensitive decisions and compliance-relevant AI outputs.

Executive Summary

SafeScan identified 143 AI systems across the organisation. The organisation shows strong AI adoption, but lacks complete governance controls, documented human oversight, and a centralised AI risk register.

Three high-priority remediation actions are recommended within 30 days, with board review advised before expanding AI usage into sensitive workflows.

Regulatory Mapping

EU AI Act readiness review
GDPR data protection exposure
ISO 42001 AI management controls
NIST AI RMF governance mapping
Australian AI governance alignment
Compliance Heatmap

Multi-framework AI governance coverage.

SafeScan maps AI risk across major regulatory and governance frameworks so leadership can see which obligations are strong, incomplete, or require urgent attention.

Highest Priority Gap
ISO 42001 Controls
FrameworkCoverageStatusPriority Action
EU AI Act
72%
Needs ReviewComplete high-risk AI classification
GDPR
81%
ModerateReview data processing and vendor DPAs
ISO 42001
64%
Gap DetectedImplement AI management system controls
NIST AI RMF
78%
ModerateDocument risk measurement procedures
Australian AI Principles
89%
StrongMaintain governance evidence
Potential Regulatory Exposure

Potential regulatory exposure depends on the severity of findings, applicable regulations, organisation size, revenue, jurisdiction, and remediation actions taken.

Based on the sample findings in this demo, unresolved governance gaps, shadow AI usage, and missing oversight controls may increase legal, regulatory, and operational risk over time.

Illustrative Regulatory Exposure
Varies by organisation
EU AI Act (certain infringements)
Up to €35M or 7%*
Selected AI Act obligations
Up to €15M or 3%*
Certain transparency obligations
Up to €7.5M or 1%*
Organisation-specific exposure
Generated from assessment
Demo Insight

Demo insight only: organisations that strengthen AI governance and oversight may reduce future compliance risk, remediation effort, and executive reporting burden. Actual outcomes depend on organisation size, jurisdiction, applicable laws, and implemented controls.

Sample AI Inventory

Demo-only inventory showing how tools are classified.

AI ToolRiskStatus
ChatGPT EnterpriseLowApproved
Microsoft CopilotLowApproved
ClaudeMediumReview Required
PerplexityMediumRestricted
Custom Internal GPTHighGovernance Missing
Unknown Browser AI PluginHighUnapproved

90-Day Remediation Roadmap

1
Deploy AI Governance Policy
2
Create approved AI tools register
3
Review vendor DPAs and data residency
4
Implement human oversight controls
5
Prepare board-ready evidence pack
Sample Board Report Preview

What a SafeScan report includes

Executive summary
Risk heatmap
AI inventory register
Critical findings
Regulatory mapping
Vendor risk review
Policy gap analysis
90-day action plan
Real reports require a paid plan

This public demo uses sample data only. To scan your real AI tools, generate live compliance reports, and export board-ready PDFs, create an account and start your Professional plan.

Start Professional from $700/month

Your organisation could have similar AI risks hidden today.

SafeScan gives teams a faster way to understand AI risk, prepare board-ready reports, and act before compliance issues become expensive.